We would be hard pressed to find a more emotionally charged
issue in the United States today than the debate that rages around the subject
of abortion. Politically, careers hang
in the balance depending upon how one views the subject. Legally, the questions rage around the legal
status of the unborn child.
Biologically, the question is "when does human life actually
begin". Morally, the question is,
"Is it murder?" It is a
question about which Christians must have an opinion, and that opinion must be
the right one.
Size of the Problem
In 1979 the Cincinnati Enquirer wrote, "When the
Supreme Court knocked out state anti-abortion laws six years ago, it made legal
killing the nation's most common form of surgery. The toll so far is awesome: At least 6,000,000 legal abortions since that
January 22, 1973 decree, close to two a minute.
Look at Washington D.C., the nation's if not the world's abortion
capital: in 1976, an unbelievable 9102
abortions were performed on white women for every 1000 live births. For other races the ration
was 2210 for every 1000 babies born."
Simply put, an abortion is the destruction and discarding of
an unborn baby. There are several
methods of abortion normally performed.
It is beyond the scope of this study to examine them in any detail. It will be sufficient to state that a
description of what actually takes place is as horrific as any torture
imaginable. One particularly gruesome
and controversial method is called a "partial birth" abortion. In this, as the name suggests, the baby is
essentially killed while partway through the mother's birth canal.
is allowable if, in the opinion of the mother, a birth would cause economic or
A statement such as this demonstrates that it is time to
evaluate priorities and values. Should
economic and social considerations be placed above life?
Children are to be a blessing from God, not a curse.
This teaches that in child-bearing women can find a
wonderful blessing. Certainly, finances
and social activities plan an important role in our lives, but any decisions we
make concerning them must be made from a proper biblical perspective. The Bible teaches that children are a marvelous
blessing from God, and to view them as an unwanted burden, either economically
or socially, is to have a completely perverted set of priorities.
To kill and destroy an unborn baby simply because it is
going to be a burden is the highest form of arrogance, abhorrence, and
selfishness. The mother has options
other than simply killing her baby. If
she is not financially able to care for the baby, she can find suitable adoptive
parents, which is the highest form of humility, love, and selflessness: characteristics
of God himself.
is justified when there is the likely prospect that the child will be born
mentally or physically defective."
Once again the question of values and priorities could be
raised, but there is another way to look at this argument.
We are all going to die.
This question is, does that give me the right, or anyone the right, to
decide to end the life of an unborn baby who is as much alive as you or
me? The answer to that question is that
we do not have the right. All through
the Bible murder is condemned. Defective
or not, that human being growing in the womb of it 's mother is still created
in the image of God and we do not have the right to end his or her existence.
is justified for medical reasons – i.e., to save the life of the mother."
To set the record straight, such cases are very rare and
becoming more so all the time. However,
this issue is, does the mother's health warrant the killing of her tiny son or
daughter? There is a lesson taught in
Proverbs that is helpful in this case.
Think about this for a minute: my physical condition is
important, but more so are those qualities in my spirit that make me what I
am. We can never violate divine teaching
in pursuit of physical comfort or even life.
Let's look at a parallel.
Suppose that you were dying, and you needed a kidney to live. Let's suppose that you knew someone who has a
kidney that your body would accept. Now
this potential donor is very much alive, but you are stronger then he is. If you
wanted his kidney, could you take it by force?
Would you be justified in killing this person so that you may live?
is justified in cases or rape and incest."
Isn't it interesting that our society has determined that a
guilty rapist cannot be executed for his crime, but then it turns right around
and says that if pregnancy results from that rape you can execute the innocent
Surely in situations such as this the mental and emotional
anguish must be tremendous. But the
Bible teaches that God will not allow us to be tested beyond that which we are
able to bear.
1 Corinthians 10:13
Therefore, if a burden has been placed upon me and there is
not a right means of removing that burden given in God's word, then He has
promised to sustain me through it.
Listen to the Lord's instruction:
Hebrews 4:15, 16
The Lord invites us to approach Him when our burdens are
great. If in these cases abortion is
justified because of the mental anguish, then what we are saying is that
emotional stress and anguish justifies the killing of another human being. That simply is not morally right and
proper. Rather than resorting to killing
to relieve mental stress we must turn to God, and with His help, learn to deal
with circumstances as they are.
Has The Right?
The ultimate goal of those who desire abortion on-demand is
that abortion should be an absolute right and that law should not interfere,
except to regulate the standards of those doing the abortions. This is based upon the assumption that a
woman has the right to control her own body.
A leading feminist by the name of Margaret Sanger said, "No woman
can call herself free until she can choose consciously whether she will or will
not be a mother." The belief that a
woman has the right to control her own body and therefore have an abortion if
she wants one must be rejected for the reasons that follow.
Only God has absolute rights. We have rights, but they are only privileges
that God has given us. Mankind has no
absolute rights. No one has the rights
to his or her own body. Whatever
liberties God has extended to us, the freedom to do whatever we want with our
bodies with impunity is not one of them.
1 Corinthians 6:19, 20
In marriage, control over one's body is given to the
1 Corinthians 7:4
The non-Christian, also, still has responsibilities to God
as his Creator. Besides, even if the
mother had rights over her own body, that unborn child is not part of her
body. This is a simple biological
fact. That child has a separate blood
supply, separate circulatory system, separate heartbeat, separate brainwaves,
and even it's own separate will very early
along. From the day of fertilization the
human embryo is distinctly foreign tissue to it's
mother. In abortion, a completely
separate human being is destroyed.
One more comment is needed to Margret Sanger's
statement. When a woman makes the
conscious choice of becoming sexually active, she must also accept the
possibility of conceiving a child. It is
a necessary and unavoidable possible consequence of her actions.
There are many different approaches that can be taken when
discussing abortion from a negative standpoint, but the most important
viewpoint of all is scripture. As with
all our examination of moral issues, we will focus on what the Bible says about
the life of the unborn child developing within it's
Much of the debate centers around whether or not the
developing child is really a human being, in the same sense that we are. The pro-abortionists would be forced to deny
that the unborn child is fully human.
The question is, what does the Creator of life say? If we can show that the Creator, God, views
the developing child as a distinct, very real human being, then for all good
and honest hearts, the debate is ended – abortion would be murder.
Genesis 1:27 – 2:7
God created human life only once, after that, He was
finished with all and rested from His creative work. From that point, life procreates. The idea of procreation is that new life begins, not that life begins. Life is a continuous process. The question inside the womb is not
"when does life begin?" but "when does a new life begin?"
Activity In The Womb
Job is talking about the process of his own bodily
formation. In very beautiful poetic
language, Job describes his development in the womb. He begins by comparing his formation to the
pouring out of milk into a container, suggesting the beginning of
fertilization. Then, God begins to
"stir the milk", turning it into cheese, or the finished
product. God is directly and intimately
involved with the child from the start to the finish. This is not some inhuman mass of tissue that God
does not become involved with until birth, but rather this is a human being
that God loves. According to verses 11
and 12, God Himself develops our frame and grants life and loving-kindness. This is hardly descriptive of an inhuman mass
Jeremiah 1:4, 5
Once again we witness God's direct involvement with the
child in it's mother's womb. This passage so clearly bears this out for it
declares that God "knew" Jeremiah and consecrated him before he was
born. This demonstrates that the developing
child was viewed not as a mass of tissue only, but as a person, a human
being. In this case, a human being who
was set aside for service to the Lord prior to his birth, while still within
This passage gives perhaps the most complete account of
prenatal development in scripture. The
whole psalm has as it's basic message the inescapable
presence of God. It shows that no matter
where we go, we cannot flee from our Creator.
Why is God so intimately concerned about mankind?
When David begins verse 13 with the word "for", he
is about to tell us that God's constant interest in man is simply the natural
interest that a maker would have in a very special product. God had formed man's "inward
parts". Literally translated this
would be "kidneys", referring to man's most deep-seated organs. We are told that He weaved man in the
mother's womb. What a graphic term to
describe the process of development whereby God took the basic frame of man,
which He had created, and laced it with series after series of cartilage,
muscle, blood vessels, and tissue. Yes,
God seeks us now because he made us then, and from our very earliest moments we
were in His tender loving care. No
wonder David exclaims, "I am fearfully and wonderfully made".
In verse 15, David is saying that even though this work is
being performed out of the sight of man, God is there. He is skillfully forming the tissues and
organs that physically are a person.
Verse 16 shows that even before there is a discernible form to the human
frame, God has his watchful eyes upon him.
The word for "unformed substance" literally means something
folded into the shape of an egg, much like a very early embryo. The point seems to be that even though this
developing person does not look human yet, God is aware, interested, and
active. His eye is upon the developing
child and in a very real sense He is governing and guiding the
development. It is interesting, also, that
in these verses, David uses first person pronouns: "I, me, my". He regarded God to be at work with him
personally, not merely with some mass of tissue that would later become a
When carefully considered, this passage must inspire respect
for unborn human life. God is at work
there. However, such respect for the
Origin of life is not to be found among the pro-abortionists. Abortion is foul-tampering with the handiwork
Activity In The Womb
This is the account of two pregnant women, carrying
extraordinary children, and their coming together. Elizabeth was carrying John, and of course,
Mary was carrying our Lord. By looking
at this passage we can gain insights into the status of the unborn. Look at verse 36: Elizabeth was in her sixth
month. (Today, less and less protection
is being given to a six month old fetus.)
As Mary came to Elizabeth and greeted her, John, the six-month-old
developing baby within her leaped for joy.
This wasn't just some sort of quickening or small movement, this was a
very human reaction. This was also not
coincidence; the Holy Spirit saw fit to specify that the reason was for
joy. Here is proof that a developing
unborn baby at the sixth month is capable of expressing joy: a human emotion.
Now, what of Jesus?
We really do not know how far along Mary was at this time, but it is
obvious that she was not too far into her pregnancy. In Luke 1:26-38, we are told about the angel
appearing to Mary and telling her what was going to take place. In verse 39 of that chapter we find that
"in those days" Mary arose and went to Elizabeth. So it was very soon after her conception that
Mary went to her cousin Elizabeth. Jesus
would have been very early in His development; according to pro-abortion
arguments, He would not have been human.
Yet, when Mary brought the unborn Jesus close to the unborn John, there
was a leap of joy. It wasn't the arrival
of Mary or an non-human mass of living tissue that prompted John's joy, it was
the arrival in his home of the unborn Savior of the world. The passage is not just the account of the
meeting of two expectant mothers – it is the account of the meeting of two as
yet unborn children.
Fetus Is A Human Baby
The Law Of Moses contains ordinances concerning the death of
an unborn baby. Read carefully these
The NAS is a poor translation in this passage; it reads,
"If men…strike a woman with child so that she has a miscarriage, yet there
is no further injury, he shall surely be fined." The English word "miscarriage" means
the birth of a dead child. From here,
one would think that Moses' law states that if a man strikes a pregnant woman
so that the baby dies, his punishment would not be for murder if no
"further" injury resulted.
However, the word here translated "miscarriage" simply means
"to come out, to exit, to go forth," and the word "further"
was added by the translators. All other
reputable translations indicate that the baby simply comes out, alive or dead:
either a miscarriage or a premature birth.
The ordinance continues to stipulate that if no lasting harm results,
that is, if the baby is born alive, he shall merely be fined. However, if injury follows to either the
mother or the baby, he shall be punished life for life, limb for limb. If the baby is born dead, he will pay with
his life, as if he had killed anyone else.
The law makes no distinction between killing a man and killing a fetus:
it is the taking of a human life.
Interestingly, in the original language of the New
Testament, there is no equivalent for our English word "fetus." One word in Greek was used in scripture to
refer to babies both born and unborn: BREPHOS.
J. H. Thayer defines this as "1) an unborn child, embryo, a fetus;
2) a new-born child, an infant, a babe."
Note these verses from the NKJ using the word BREPHOS:
Luke 1:41 Unborn: babe =
Luke 1:44 Unborn: babe =
Luke 2:12, 16 Born: babe
2 Timothy 3:15 Born:
childhood = BREPHOS
1 Peter 2:2 Born:
new-born babes = BREPHOS
The inspired writers felt no need to show any distinction
between children before and after birth – one word was sufficient to speak of
both. Actually, this word usage in
scripture describes unborn life, new-born life, and childhood. The conclusion is obvious: childhood extends
into the womb.
The pro-abortionists prefer not to speak of the unborn this
way. The term "product of
conception" has even been used to refer to the unborn baby so we might not
so easily think of it as a human life.
Rarely today do we hear of a pregnant woman as being "with
Act Of Begetting
The New Testament word in the original Greek for giving
birth and bearing offspring is GENNAO (from whence,
"generation"). Thayer defines
this "of men who fathered children, to be born, to be begotten, of women
giving birth to children…" An
interesting use of this word is found in Matthew 1. The first 16 verses list the genealogy of
Jesus. In each verse, this word, GENNAO
is used to indicate that a man fathered a son.
However, in verse 20 an angel tells Joseph that which is conceived in
Mary is of the Holy Spirit. The word
"conceived" here is the same word: GENNAO, or begotten. The Holy Spirit uses the same word to refer
to either the process of conception or the process of birth without
distinction. Christ was begotten of God
before His birth. He was the living Son
of God inside the womb as much as He was after His birth.
The point is this: the only event that we can logically look
to as the beginning of the new life is conception.
2 Timothy 3:3
The word translated "unloving" or "without
natural affection" is ASTORGOS (from "A," meaning
"without" and "STORGE," meaning "family
love"). In his Daily Study Bible
work, William Barclay writes this about Romans 1:31:
"STORGE was the special Greek
word for family love. It was quite true
that this was an age in which family love was dying. Never was the life of the child so precarious
as at this time. Children were
considered a misfortune. When a child
was born, the child was taken and laid at the father's feet. If the father lifted up the child, that meant
that he acknowledged it. If he turned
away and left it, the child was literally thrown out. There was never a night when there were not
thirty or forty abandoned children left in the Roman forum... Even Seneca, great soul as he was, could
write: 'We kill a mad dog; we slaughter
a fierce ox; we plunge the knife into sickly cattle lest they taint the herd;
children who are born weakly and deformed we drown.' The natural bonds of human affection had been
The widespread acceptance of abortion has changed the
concept of human worth in America. The
Bible teaches that a person has worth merely because he is bearing the image of
God. However, many today believe that is
not enough. They have imposed other
definitions upon God's simple truths. We
are often told that since the developing embryo does not look human, it is not
With the scriptural arguments given, that should be the end
of the matter. However, the science of
biology bears out further testimony in harmony with scripture.
are the facts?
At conception the genetic code that determines
humanness is already present.
The heart, which begins beating as early as the
18th day, is by the third week beating regularly and sending an entirely
independent blood supply through the little body.
At 3 weeks, probably before the woman knows she
is pregnant, the baby is 1/10 of an inch long.
She or he possesses the beginnings of eyes, a spinal cord, a nervous
system, a thyroid gland, lungs, a stomach, a liver, kidneys, intestines and a
At 6 weeks brain waves can be measured, the
absence of which is used to determine death.
At 45 days the baby's skeleton is complete in
cartilage and the unborn child can make the first movements of it's arms and legs.
It will be another 12 weeks before the mother can feel it.
At 60 days the baby can grasp an object and make
are the conclusions?
The Bible tells us that life is in the blood
(Genesis 9:4-6). Therefore, the unborn
child with its own blood and circulatory system is a human life.
The Bible tells us that the body without the
spirit is dead (James 2:26). Therefore,
as the unborn child is a human life, it has a spirit, it has a soul.
When a baby is aborted, it is logical to
conclude that it can suffer pain.
Do not be deceived.
Developing within the mother is a human being, very much alive and made
in the image of God. Man has worth because
of who he is – man, made in God's image – and not because of what he might
become. The worth is not determined by
some man-made criterion.
It is true that the little unborn child is for all intents
and purposes helpless. But the helpless
and the poor deserve extra care, not abuse by the strong. The Bible teaches that a person has worth,
dignity, and the right to life because he or she is a person, made in the image
of God. It is clear that that also
applies to the unborn child – very much a person according to God's Word.
And Questions For Discussion
Will the young woman who keeps herself from
premarital sex ever need to think about becoming an unwed mother?
Does God have the authority to ordain among
humans what is and what is not to be considered normal and natural affections?
Those in favor of abortion claim that a woman
has the power to do anything with her body that she desires. Neglecting that there are actually two bodies
involved, what implication is derived from 1 Corinthians 6:19, 20?
If an expectant mother does not have the
financial ability, emotional stability, or the maturity to raise a child, what
reasonable options other than abortion does she have?
Do you think an unborn baby has feelings? Do you think he is sensitive to discomfort?
What does it mean to be "begotten?"
Read what David writes in Psalm 12:3-5 about
mistreating the poor and helpless. What
application do these principles have for those who would destroy by abortion?